Skip to content
  • Submit

  • Category

  • Sort by

  • Per page

Found 10087 publications. Showing page 388 of 404:

Publication  
Year  
Category

Aerosol Optical Properties and Type Retrieval via Machine Learning and an All-Sky Imager

Logothetis, Stavros-Andreas; Giannaklis, Christos-Panagiotis; Salamalikis, Vasileios; Tzoumanikas, Panagiotis; Raptis, Panagiotis-Ioannis; Amiridis, Vassilis; Eleftheratos, Kostas; Kazantzidis, Andreas

This study investigates the applicability of using the sky information from an all-sky imager (ASI) to retrieve aerosol optical properties and type. Sky information from the ASI, in terms of Red-Green-Blue (RGB) channels and sun saturation area, are imported into a supervised machine learning algorithm for estimating five different aerosol optical properties related to aerosol burden (aerosol optical depth, AOD at 440, 500 and 675 nm) and size (Ångström Exponent at 440–675 nm, and Fine Mode Fraction at 500 nm). The retrieved aerosol optical properties are compared against reference measurements from the AERONET station, showing adequate agreement (R: 0.89–0.95). The AOD errors increased for higher AOD values, whereas for AE and FMF, the biases increased for coarse particles. Regarding aerosol type classification, the retrieved properties can capture 77.5% of the total aerosol type cases, with excellent results for dust identification (>95% of the cases). The results of this work promote ASI as a valuable tool for aerosol optical properties and type retrieval.

2023

Aerosol optical properties and distribution during the extreme Arctic pollution event in spring 2006. NILU PP

Myhre, C.L.; Toledano, C.; Myhre, G.; Stebel, K.; Frioud, M.; Yttri, K.E.; Johnsrud, M.

2007

Aerosol optical properties and distribution during the extreme Arctic haze event in spring 2006.

Myhre, C.L.; Toledano, C.; Myhre, G.; Stebel, K.; Frioud, M.; Yttri, K.E.; Johnsrud, M.

2007

Aerosol optical properties and distribution during the extreme Arctic haze event in spring 2006. NILU F

Myhre, C.L.; Toledano, C.; Stebel, K.; Frioud, M.; Yttri, K.E.; Johnsrud, M.

2006

Aerosol optical properties and distribution during the extreme Arctic haze event in spring 2006.

Myhre, C.L.; Toledano, C.; Stebel, K.; Frioud, M.; Yttri, K.E.; Johnsrud, M.

2006

Aerosol optical and hygroscopic properties during TexAQS-GoMACCS 2006 and their impact on aerosol direct radiative forcing.

Massoli, P.; Bates, T.S.; Quinn, P.K.; Lack, D.A.; Baynard, T.; Lerner, B.M.; Tucker, S.C.; Brioude, J.; Stohl, A.; Williams, E.J.

2009

Aerosol microphysical effects on cloud fraction over the nighttime Arctic Ocean.

Zamora, L. M.; Kahn, R. A.; Stohl, A.; Eckhardt, S.

2017

Aerosol measurements and source apportionment at Birkenes, Norway.

Platt, S.M.; Yttri, K.E.; Fiebig, M.; Aas, W.

2015

Aerosol indirect effects on the nighttime Arctic Ocean surface from thin, predominantly liquid clouds.

Zamora, L. M.; Kahn, R. A.; Eckhardt, S.; McComiskey, A.; Sawamura, P.; Moore, R.; Stohl, A.

2017

Aerosol in situ data and long-term archiving and access - current status & final steps of the data centre NILU F

Myhre, C.L.; Fiebig, M.; , Fjæraa, A.M.; Aas, W.; Hamburger, T.; Eckhardt, P.

2014

Aerosol hygroscopicity influenced by seasonal chemical composition variations in the Arctic region

Kang, Hyojin; Jung, Chang Hoon; Lee, Bang Young; Krejci, Radovan; Heslin-Rees, Dominic; Aas, Wenche; Yoon, Young Jun

In this study, we quantified aerosol hygroscopicity parameter using aerosol microphysical observation data (κphy), analyzing monthly and seasonal trends in κphy by correlating it with aerosol chemical composition over 6 years from April 2007 to March 2013 at the Zeppelin Observatory in Svalbard, Arctic region. The monthly mean κphy value exhibited distinct seasonal variations, remaining high from winter to spring, reaching its minimum in summer, followed by an increase in fall, and maintaining elevated levels in winter. To verify the reliability of κphy, we employed the hygroscopicity parameter calculated from chemical composition data (κchem). The chemical composition and PM2.5 mass concentration required to calculate κchem was obtained through Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) reanalysis data and the calculation of κchem assumed that Arctic aerosols comprise only five species: black carbon (BC), organic matter (OM), ammonium sulfate (AS), sea salt aerosol less than a diameter of 2.5 μm (SSA2.5), and dust aerosol less than a diameter of 2.5 μm (Dust2.5). The κchem had no distinct correlation but had a similar seasonal trend compared to κphy. The κchem value followed a trend of SSA2.5 and was much higher by a factor of 1.6 ± 0.3 than κphy on average, due to a large proportion of SSA2.5 mass concentration in MERRA-2 reanalysis data. This may be due to the overestimation of sea salt aerosols in MERRA-2 reanalysis. The relationship between monthly mean κphy and the chemical composition used to calculate κchem was also analyzed. The elevated κphy from October to February resulted from the dominant influence of SSA2.5, while the maximum κphy in March was concurrently influenced by increasing AS and Dust2.5 associated with long-range transport from mid-latitude regions during Arctic haze periods and by SSA mass concentration obtained from in-situ sampling, which remained high from the preceding winter. The relatively low κphy from April to September can be attributed to low SSA2.5 and the dominance of organic compounds in the Arctic summer. Either natural sources such as those of marine and terrestrial biogenic origin or long-range-transported aerosols may contribute to the increase in organic aerosols in summer, potentially influencing the reduction in κphy of atmospheric aerosols. To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the monthly and seasonal variation of aerosol hygroscopicity calculated using long-term microphysical data, and this result provides evidence that changes in monthly and seasonal hygroscopicity variation occur depending on chemical composition.

2025

Aerosol extinction profiles with the EMEP model: First evaluation through Earlinet profiles. NILU F

Tsyro, S.; Schulz, M.; Mona, L.; Papagiannopoulos, N.; Aas, W.

2014

Aerosol decadal trends - Part 2: In-situ aerosol particle number concentrations at GAW and ACTRIS stations.

Asmi, A.; Collaud Coen, M.; Ogren, J. A.; Andrews, E.; Sheridan, P.; Jefferson, A.; Weingartner, E.; Baltensperger, U.; Bukowiecki, N.; Lihavainen, H.; Kivekäs, N.; Asmi, E.; Aalto, P. P.; Kulmala, M.; Wiedensohler, A.; Birmili, W.; Hamed, A.; O'Dowd, C.; G Jennings, S.; Weller, R.; Flentje, H.; Fjaeraa, A. M.; Fiebig, M.; Myhre, C. L.; Hallar, A. G.; Swietlicki, E.; Kristensson, A.; Laj, P.

2013

Aerosol decadal trends - Part 1: In-situ optical measurements at GAW and IMPROVE stations.

Coen, M.C.; Andrews, E.; Asmi, A.; Baltensperger, U.; Bukowiecki, N.; Day, D.; Fiebig, M.; Fjaeraa, A. M.; Flentje, H.; Hyvärinen, A.; Jefferson, A.; Jennings, S. G.; Kouvarakis, G.; Lihavainen, H.; Myhre, C.L, Malm, W. C.; Mihapopoulos, N.; Molenar, J. V.; O'Dowd, C.; Ogren, J. A.; Schichtel, B. A.; Sheridan, P.; Virkkula, A.; Weingartner, E.; Weller, R.; Laj, P.

2013

Aerosol composition and sources in the Central Arctic Ocean during ASCOS.

Chang, R. Y.-W.; Leck, C.; Graus, M.; Müller, M.; Paatero, J.; Burkhart, J. F.; Stohl, A.; Orr, L. H.; Hayden, K.; Li, S.-M.; Hansel, A.; Tjernström, M.; Leaitch, W. R.; Abbatt, J. P. D.

2011

Aerosol characterization at the sub-Arctic site Andenes (69°N, 16°E), by the analysis of columnar optical properties.

Rodríguez, E.; Toledano, C.; Cachorro, V.E.; Ortiz, P.; Stebel, K.; Berjón, A.; Blindheim, S.; Gausa, M.; de Frutos, A.M.

2012

Aerosol carbonaceous, elemental and ionic composition variability and origin at the Siberian High Arctic, Cape Baranova

Manousakas, Manousos; Popovicheva, Olga; Evangeliou, Nikolaos; Diapouli, Evangelia; Sitnikov, Nikolay; Shonija, N.; Eleftheriadis, Konstantinos

Aerosol particles are major short-lived climate forcers, because of their ability to interact with incoming solar radiation. Therefore, addressing mean levels and sources of Arctic aerosols is of high importance in the battle against climate change, due to the Arctic amplification. In the Eastern Arctic, from Finland to Alaska, only one monitoring station exists (HMO Tiksi) and the levels of the Arctic aerosols are usually recorded by sporadic campaigns, while other stations exist in Canada, Finland and Europe. From April 2015 to December 2016, the research station "Ice Base Cape Baranova" (79°16.82'N, 101°37.05'E), located on the Bolshevik island was established in the Siberian high Arctic. Samples were analyzed for equivalent Black Carbon (eBC), Organic Carbon (OC), Elemental Carbon (EC), water-soluble ions, and elements. To identify the spatial origin of the sources, the Potential Source Contributions Function (PSCF) was used in combination with FLEXPART emission sensitivities. OC is the most dominant PM compound in the Ice Cape Baranova station and mostly originates from gas flaring and other industrial regions at lower latitudes, as well as from biomass burning during summertime. Sulfate concentrations were affected by anthropogenic sources in the cold seasons and by natural sources in the warm ones showing distinct seasonal patterns. K+ and Mg2+ originate from sea-salt in winter and from forest fires in summer. The interannual variability of eBC was in good agreement with the general Arctic seasonal trends and was mainly affected by gas flaring, low latitude industrial sources and from biomass burning emissions. Cl− depletion was very low, while Na+ and Cl− originated from the locally formed sea spray.

2020

Aerosol black carbon at five background measurement sites over Finland, a gateway to the Arctic.

Hyvärinen, A.-P.; Kolmonen, P.; Kerminen, V.-M.; Virkkula, A.; Leskinen, Komppula, M.; Hatakkaa, J.; Burkhart, J.; Stohl, A.; Aalto, P.; Kulmala, M.; Lehtinen, K.E.J.; Viisanen, Y.; Lihavainen, H.

2011

Aerosol and ozone radiative forcing 1990-2015.

Myhre, C.L.; Myhre, G.; Samset, B.H.; Schulz, M.

2016

Aerosol and dynamical contributions to cloud droplet formation in Arctic low-level clouds

Motos, Ghislain; Freitas, Gabriel; Georgakaki, Paraskevi; Wieder, Jörg; Li, Guangyu; Aas, Wenche; Lunder, Chris Rene; Krejci, Radovan; Pasquier, Julie Thérèse; Henneberger, Jan; David, Robert Oscar; Ritter, Christoph; Mohr, Claudia; Zieger, Paul; Nenes, Athanasios

The Arctic is one of the most rapidly warming regions of the globe. Low-level clouds and fog modify the energy transfer from and to space and play a key role in the observed strong Arctic surface warming, a phenomenon commonly termed “Arctic amplification”. The response of low-level clouds to changing aerosol characteristics throughout the year is therefore an important driver of Arctic change that currently lacks sufficient constraints. As such, during the NASCENT campaign (Ny-Ålesund AeroSol Cloud ExperimeNT) extending over a full year from October 2019 to October 2020, microphysical properties of aerosols and clouds were studied at the Zeppelin station (475 m a.s.l.), Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, Norway. Particle number size distributions obtained from differential mobility particle sizers as well as chemical composition derived from filter samples and an aerosol chemical speciation monitor were analyzed together with meteorological data, in particular vertical wind velocity. The results were used as input to a state-of-the-art cloud droplet formation parameterization to investigate the particle sizes that can activate to cloud droplets, the levels of supersaturation that can develop, the droplet susceptibility to aerosol and the role of vertical velocity. We evaluate the parameterization and the droplet numbers calculated through a droplet closure with in-cloud in situ measurements taken during nine flights over 4 d. A remarkable finding is that, for the clouds sampled in situ, closure is successful in mixed-phase cloud conditions regardless of the cloud glaciation fraction. This suggests that ice production through ice–ice collisions or droplet shattering may have explained the high ice fraction, as opposed to rime splintering that would have significantly reduced the cloud droplet number below levels predicted by warm-cloud activation theory. We also show that pristine-like conditions during fall led to clouds that formed over an aerosol-limited regime, with high levels of supersaturation (generally around 1 %, although highly variable) that activate particles smaller than 20 nm in diameter. Clouds formed in the same regime in late spring and summer, but aerosol activation diameters were much larger due to lower cloud supersaturations (ca. 0.5 %) that develop because of higher aerosol concentrations and lower vertical velocities. The contribution of new particle formation to cloud formation was therefore strongly limited, at least until these newly formed particles started growing. However, clouds forming during the Arctic haze period (winter and early spring) can be limited by updraft velocity, although rarely, with supersaturation levels dropping below 0.1 % and generally activating larger particles (20 to 200 nm), including pollution transported over a long range. The relationship between updraft velocity and the limiting cloud droplet number agrees with previous observations of various types of clouds worldwide, which supports the universality of this relationship.

2023

Publication
Year
Category