Found 9887 publications. Showing page 162 of 396:
The report presents the outcome of GMOS Task 2.1 on current estimates for anthropogenic mercury sources and Task 2.2 on current emission estimates for natural mercury sources and re-emissions.
2013
The report describes future emission factors under different scenarios.
2013
The report describes future emission factors under different scenarios.This report is the final version of GMOS Deliverable D 2.3 Report on future emission estimates along the SQ, EXEC, and MFTR scenarios for total mercury and its chemical forms. It presents future global anthropogenic mercury emissions for different scenarios of energy and emission control policy for the reference year 2035.
2014
The report describes future emission factors under different scenarios.This report is the final version of GMOS Deliverable D 2.4 Report on mapping of Hg emissions and its chemical forms for 2030. It presents the emission maps of the Current Policy (CP), New Policy (NP) and Maximum Feasible Reduction (MFR) global mercury emission scenarios for 2035.
2013
This report is the final version of GMOS Deliverable D 2.5 Final emission data base for regional and global models related to SQ, EXEC, and MFTR emission scenarios.
2014
2000
Instrumenter som skal brukes til måling av lokal luftkvalitet i henhold til forurensningsforskriften skal være godkjente for dette formålet. Norge har per i dag ingen godkjenningsordning. Inntil videre godkjennes derfor de instrumenter som det svenske referanselaboratoriet for luft har godkjent.
Denne rapporten beskriver hvordan en godkjenningsordning kan etableres i Norge, basert på rutinen brukt i Sverige, gjennom å belyse den lovmessige forankringen og prosedyren for typegodkjenning. Oppgavene og ansvarsfordelingen mellom den ansvarlige forvaltningsmyndigheten (Miljødirektoratet) og Referanselaboratoriet er forklart.
Miljødirektoratet rapport, M-1327/2019.
NILU
2019
2007
2010
2017
Atmospheric nitrogen and sulfur deposition is an important effect of atmospheric pollution and may affect forest ecosystems positively, for example enhancing tree growth, or negatively, for example causing acidification, eutrophication, cation depletion in soil or nutritional imbalances in trees. To assess and design measures to reduce the negative impacts of deposition, a good estimate of the deposition amount is needed, either by direct measurement or by modeling. In order to evaluate the precision of both approaches and to identify possible improvements, we compared the deposition estimates obtained using an Eulerian model with the measurements performed by two large independent networks covering most of Europe. The results are in good agreement (bias <25%) for sulfate and nitrate open field deposition, while larger differences are more evident for ammonium deposition, likely due to the greater influence of local ammonia sources. Modeled sulfur total deposition compares well with throughfall deposition measured in forest plots, while the estimate of nitrogen deposition is affected by the tree canopy. The geographical distribution of pollutant deposition and of outlier sites where model and measurements show larger differences are discussed.
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
2024
2013
2013
2013
2025