Skip to content
  • Submit

  • Category

  • Sort by

  • Per page

Found 10000 publications. Showing page 208 of 400:

Publication  
Year  
Category

Introduction: Redox interfaces in marine waters. Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, 22

Yakushev, E.V.; Newton, A.

2013

Intuitively tuned elastic bias correction of atmospheric inversion using Gaussian process prior: Application to accidental radioactive emissions

Brožová, Antonie; Šmídl, Václav; Tichý, Ondřej; Evangeliou, Nikolaos

Precise estimation of atmospheric pollutant releases is crucial for assessing the impact of environmental accidents. Atmospheric inversion typically relies on a linear model with a source–receptor sensitivity (SRS) matrix, which may contain significant errors or even completely fail to capture the real magnitude of the event. We propose a correction of the SRS matrix formulated as slight shifts in the observation locations, effectively warping the sensitivity field. To constrain these shifts and ensure data-driven corrections, we model them using a Gaussian process prior. This prior not only enforces smoothness and sparsity, but also enables posterior prediction of shifts at previously unseen locations. This key feature provides a mechanism for hyper-parameter tuning: the predicted shift field can be visualized on a map and assessed by an expert. We present a user-friendly framework that combines a Bayesian inversion model with correction and a tuning algorithm based on L-curve-like plots and the maps of predicted shifts. The proposed method is demonstrated on three case studies: the ETEX-I experiment, the 137Cs emissions during the 2020 Chernobyl wildfires, and the 106Ru release in 2017.

2026

Inventory review 2005. Emission data reported to LRTAP Convention and NEC Directive. Initial review for HMs and POPs. EMEP/MSC-W Technical report, 1/2005

Vestreng, V.; Breivik, K.; Adams, M.; Wagner, A.; Goodwin, J.; Rozovskaya, O.; Pacyna J.M.

2005

Inventory Review 2006; Emission Data reported to the LRTAP Convention and NEC Directive. Stage 1, 2 and 3 review and evaluation of inventories of HMs and POPs. EMEP/MSC-W Technical report, 1/2006

Vestreng, V.; Rigler, E.; Adams, M.; Kindbom, K.; Pacyna, J.M.; van der Gon, H.D.; Reis, S.; Travnikov, O.

2006

Inverse modeling of 137Cs during Chernobyl 2020 wildfires without the first guess

Tichý, Ondřej; Evangeliou, Nikolaos; Selivanova, Anna; Šmídl, Václav

2025

Inverse modeling of halocarbons: sensitivity to the baseline definition

Vojta, Martin; Thompson, Rona Louise; Zwaaftink, Christine Groot; Stohl, Andreas

2021

Inverse modeling of N2O emissions. NILU F

Thompson, R.L.; Bergamaschi, P.; Karstens, U.; Ishijima, K.; Saikawa, E.; Corazza, M.

2014

Inverse Modeling of Subnational Scale CO2 Emissions Using Data from Denser Surface Observation Networks

Nayagam, Lorna Raja; Maksyutov, Shamil; Oda, Tomohiro; Achari, Rajesh Janardanan; Trisolini, Pamela; Zeng, Jiye; Kaiser, Johannes; Matsunaga, Tsuneo

2023

Inverse modeling of volcanic emissions and their use for quantitative dispersion modeling: the 12th March 2021 Etna’s eruption

Kampouri, Anna; Tichý, Ondřej; Evangeliou, Nikolaos; Amiridis, Vassilis; Solomos, Stavros; Marinou, Eleni; Gialitaki, Anna; Gkikas, Antonis; Proestakis, Emmanouil; Scollo, Simona; Merucci, Luca; Mona, Lucia; Papagiannopoulos, Nikolaos; Zanis, Prodromos

2022

Inverse modelling of European CH4 emissions during 2006–2012 using different inverse models and reassessed atmospheric observations

Bergamashci, Peter; Karstens, Ute; Manning, Alistair J.; Saunois, Marielle; Tsuruta, Aki; Berchet, Antoine; Vermeulen, Alexander T.; Arnold, Tim; Janssens-Maenhout, Greet; Hammer, Samuel; Levin, Ingeborg; Schmidt, Martina; Ramonet, Michel; Lopez, Morgan; Lavric, Jost; Aalto, Tuula; Chen, Huilin; Feist, Dietrich G.; Gerbig, Christoph; Haszpra, László; Hermansen, Ove; Manca, Giovanni; Moncrieff, John; Meinhardt, Frank; Necki, Jaroslaw; Galkowski, Michal; O'Doherty, Simon; Paramonova, Nina; Scheeren, Hubertus A.; Steinbacher, Martin; Dlugokencky, Ed

We present inverse modelling (top down) estimates of European methane (CH4) emissions for 2006–2012 based on a new quality-controlled and harmonised in situ data set from 18 European atmospheric monitoring stations. We applied an ensemble of seven inverse models and performed four inversion experiments, investigating the impact of different sets of stations and the use of a priori information on emissions.

The inverse models infer total CH4 emissions of 26.8 (20.2–29.7) Tg CH4 yr−1 (mean, 10th and 90th percentiles from all inversions) for the EU-28 for 2006–2012 from the four inversion experiments. For comparison, total anthropogenic CH4 emissions reported to UNFCCC (bottom up, based on statistical data and emissions factors) amount to only 21.3 Tg CH4 yr−1 (2006) to 18.8 Tg CH4 yr−1 (2012). A potential explanation for the higher range of top-down estimates compared to bottom-up inventories could be the contribution from natural sources, such as peatlands, wetlands, and wet soils. Based on seven different wetland inventories from the Wetland and Wetland CH4 Inter-comparison of Models Project (WETCHIMP), total wetland emissions of 4.3 (2.3–8.2) Tg CH4 yr−1 from the EU-28 are estimated. The hypothesis of significant natural emissions is supported by the finding that several inverse models yield significant seasonal cycles of derived CH4 emissions with maxima in summer, while anthropogenic CH4 emissions are assumed to have much lower seasonal variability. Taking into account the wetland emissions from the WETCHIMP ensemble, the top-down estimates are broadly consistent with the sum of anthropogenic and natural bottom-up inventories. However, the contribution of natural sources and their regional distribution remain rather uncertain.

Furthermore, we investigate potential biases in the inverse models by comparison with regular aircraft profiles at four European sites and with vertical profiles obtained during the Infrastructure for Measurement of the European Carbon Cycle (IMECC) aircraft campaign. We present a novel approach to estimate the biases in the derived emissions, based on the comparison of simulated and measured enhancements of CH4 compared to the background, integrated over the entire boundary layer and over the lower troposphere. The estimated average regional biases range between −40 and 20 % at the aircraft profile sites in France, Hungary and Poland.

2018

Inverse modelling of N2O fluxes over Europe: An EYE-CLIMA initiative

Krishnankutty, Nalini; Thompson, Rona Louise; Berchet, Antoine; Winiwarter, Wilfried; Henne, Stephan; Karstens, Ute

2025

Inverse modelling of radionuclide release rates using atmospheric dispersion modelling. NILU PP

Hamburger, T.; Stohl, A.; von Haustein, C.; Thummerer, S.; Wallner, C.

2014

Inverse modelling of radionuclide release rates using gamma dose rate observations.

Hamburger, T.; Evangeliou, N.; Stohl, A.; von Haustein, C.; Thummerer, S.; Wallner, C.

2015

Inverse modelling of radionuclide release rates using gamma dose rate observations.

Hamburger, T.; Stohl, A.; von Haustein, C.; Thummerer, S.; Wallner, C.

2014

Investigating climate change impacts on contaminant exposure in the Arctic using the Nested Exposure Model

Krogseth, Ingjerd Sunde; Breivik, Knut; Eckhardt, Sabine; Routti, Heli Anna Irmeli; Eulaers, Igor; Dietze, Jørn; Decristoforo, Gregor; Harju, Mikael; Aars, Jon; Wania, Frank

2026

Investigating climate change impacts on PCB-153 exposure in Arctic food webs using the Nested Exposure Model

Krogseth, Ingjerd Sunde; Routti, Heli; Breivik, Knut; Eckhardt, Sabine; Eulaers, Igor; Dietze, Jörn Lukas Franz; Decristoforo, Gregor; Harju, Mikael; Wania, Frank

2025

Publication
Year
Category